Administrative Sanction Implementation Towards Building Permit Management Contrary to Building Approval in Way Kanan

Abstract

The discussed issues concern the government's oversight of building construction in the Way Kana, which has not yet been maximised.  Therefore, there are constructed buildings that are not in accordance with the actual function written on the legalised construction permission, due to a lack of funds for the Investment and Integrated Service Agency in Way Kanan Region to oversee the buildings, which are responsible for this field. That explains why there are buildings with a contrary function to DPMPTSP's enacted permission in the Way Kanan Region. Legitimate permission for building construction is a Building Permit (IMB), regulated by the 28th Law of 2002 on construction buildings, which was recently modified by the 22nd Government Regulations, instead of the Law of 2022 on Job Creation, which changed IMB to Building Approval (PBG). The issue in this research is how oversight and supervision of permissions for buildings are carried oute Way Kathe nan Region, and h,ow the adstrative sanctions would be applied. This article uses juridical normative and juridical empirical approaches to the problem. The sources and types of data in this research include primary and secondary data. Data was analysed with a descriptive qualitative method. According to the research results, supervision of Buildings in the Way Kanan Region is at an acceptable level but not at a maximised level yet, resulting in some people still violating the currently active regulation. However, fortunately, the administrative sanction application against the crosser is already in accordance with the currently active regulations in Way Kanan Region, namely Way Kanan's 16th Regional Regulation of 2018 on Building Permit Retribution. A factor resulting from a lack of supervision due to funding constraints, as many areas in the Way Kanan Region remain remote.